Early Childhood Action Conference
May 31, 2002
Concordia
University, St. Paul, MN
Part 2: Final Report on the Sessions
Approach:
Each of the five strands at the Conference had its own
leaders and recorders. Some
recorders followed a suggested format in their reports; other recorders found
that a different formatting followed better the focus and course of their
strands. All of the strand reports
provide a useful summary of the events at the conference.
Very little editing was needed, as the reports are both informative and
meaningful.
Dan Gartrell, June 27, 2002
Contents:
Page
MnAEYC
Initiatives
2
Political
Connections
5
Systems
Approach to Financing the Profession
8
T.E.A.C.H.
11
Men in Early
Childhood Education
14
MnAEYC
Initiatives
Facilitator:
Kate Zabertini, President-Elect of MnAEYC
Recorder:
Penny Warner, MnAECTE,
1.
Recent
history—last 5 years or so
GOALS:
Clearinghouse
for everyone who has anything to do with young children (and their
families). Reach out to these
people, figure out what is needed and provide it.
Director’s
Credential: achieved through a
cohort group. One year of
credit from a community college. Came
out of the initiatives for professional development.
It will become the Professional Development Program.
MnAEYC
is actually a state affiliate of a national organization (NAEYC).
It is both positive and negative.
An affiliate group must have 50 members and a 501C status.
Striving
to take on a more “political” role.
Not to endorse candidates, but instead to take a stand on issues.
PROBLEMS:
How
do members address issues in their field(s)_.
How
to get things accomplished with such a varied membership_
2.
Major
advancements in progress, major obstacles to progress
A.
TRY TO ESTABLISH A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DAY
Looking
at the Friday of the MnAEYC Conference
B.
MEGA CONFERENCE IDEA
All
of the agencies that work with or for children host a large conference together
in effort to make a unified stand.
C.
STAGING A WALK-OUT/TEACH-OUT/ STRIKE DAY
This
event would ask that all people who are working with young children do not work
on a specific day. This will make a
publicity statement about the work that we do.
Comments
from the group:
·
Public opinion would most likely
frown upon a walk out. This is not
teaching the children a positive way to work through a problem.
·
If it is planned out as suggested,
then it may not have the same impact because all of the parents will make other
plans.
·
Try to make a statement in a more positive
way. More visual for impact:
such as a walk-to a professional day instead of a WALK OUT!
Possibly walk from the Convention Center to the Metrodome to create a
visual demonstration of the amount of people who are involved in caring for
young children.
·
Question:
Why are we really “walking out_”
It was already mentioned that we need to focus on one htmlect; we need to
choose the focus.
Question
to the group:
Why do you do this_
·
I started
this occupation because of the children. I
now am working to make the teachers accountable for the expectations that we
have for our program. (Trying to
end the “stayed, but left”
syndrome.)
·
Help
teachers “get” what is going on with the children in their care.
·
Helping
family child care providers see themselves as professionals.
Also assure that they do something with the children who they work with
each day.
·
Want to
see more hours of training for family childcare providers.
Confident that there is a “trickle down” effect that some of the
training that that we are doing really is getting to the children.
·
Would like
to see more research on children who were raised in childcare environments.
(How are they doing later in life_)
·
I enjoy
the consultation with the teachers. Hold
the teachers to task.
·
My passion
to work with children comes from taking a year off from work and taking care of
my own child. I think that passion
is both anger and love. It calls us
into a deeper place. It takes a
while to get there.
·
We must be
careful of our strategic events. Since
it does take time, we must plan accordingly.
·
How is our country (our system) set up for taking
care of our children_
3.
Strategies
for addressing obstacles and enhancing advancements
Two
pieces that seem to be evolving from discussion:
1.
We need to have a clear message
2.
We need an event or way to get that message across
Some
ideas from the group:
·
Walk
for the Cause, like a “walk for the cure”
·
Walk
With the Children
may have the most visual effect.
·
Parents
and their children could have a picnic at the Capitol grounds.
·
Instead of focusing on what
the teachers are NOT getting, FOCUS ON WHAT CHILDREN
GET FROM THEIR TEACHERS
·
World’s Longest Rope: have
a rope that stretches from the conference center to the Metrodome.
This will get the focus on the topic.
·
Not just at legislature
issue; it is a public awareness issue. That is the way to get it to the legislatures.
One way to do the public awareness is to have
·
Consumer Awareness is
also important. Many parents do not
know what to look for in childcare.
·
Ready for K is doing a
kick-off in the fall. Would like to
have people from various agencies all hold hands together as a united message.
·
Transition from Preschool to Kindergarten. New Horizon Child Care has made the move to consult with the
school districts and ask for their curriculum, so that the preschool teachers
know what to be preparing the students for.
4.
Planning/coordinating
follow-up events
EARLY
YEARS ARE LEARNING YEARS—MAKE THEM COUNT
· Kids are important
· What happens early, matters
· Systematic development (stages): foundations
· EDUCATORS--impact lives
-children -staff -parents
· Children are learning all of the time (impressionable)
· Picture campaign (child building with blocks/architect, boy with doll/doctor)
· Everyone needs to be involved/invested/responsible
· Ask questions to make people think!
· What is YOUR issue___ It is all about kids!
· Research: what is working in other countries_ What has changed the military view on childcare_
POSSIBLE SLOGANS:
Invest
in YOUR future…
We
are connected to kids! (This goes
along with the theme of all of the childcare providers walking together through
the streets holding the longest rope in history.)
Upcoming
Conference:
MnAEYC Conference
October 10-12,
2002
Friday
Keynote: Jonah Martin Edelman, Executive Director, Stand for Children
Saturday
Keynote: Madelyn Swift, author
Political Connections
Next Steps
Leader:
Ann Kaner-Roth
Fill-in
recorder: Katie Connor
The
group identified 9 areas in which action is needed over the next few years.
The suggestions were both broad and specific.
1.
Legal Unlicensed Care
·
Laurie
Possin will be putting together a task force to analyze this issue
·
The goal of
the task force: to discuss and
address the strategies surrounding the tiered reimbursement plan from the
Alliance of Early Childhood Professionals, with some specific attention paid to
the issue of legal unlicensed care
·
The task
force will issue a report with their findings
2.
Early Childhood Leadership in the Legislature
·
Actively
recruit members to sit on early childhood committees
o
Brainstorm
names for the committees
§
Children’s
Defense Fund will distribute information on names of early childhood supporters
to support for committees
o
Convince
Senate leadership to bring back the Early Childhood Committee
o
Identify
legislators that send their children to child care
3.
Campaign Year Involvement
·
Distribute a
list of questions that parents/providers could ask legislative candidates, both
privately (i.e. during door knocking) and in candidate forums
o
501-C-3
organizations can distribute questions legally
o
Other
organizations could use these questions for their own distribution and on their
own websites
·
CDF will be
issuing their legislative report card, which
can be linked to on-line
o
Ask parents
and providers to share the answers they receive when they ask legislators these
questions
o
CDF and
Child Care WORKS could act as a clearinghouse for these answers
·
Try to build
relationships between legislators and centers
·
CCW could
distribute step-by-step instructions to invite candidates to a child care center
o
Centers
would have to invite all candidates to avoid “electioneering”
o
CCR&R’s
could also distribute this information
o
Centers
could also invite legislators after they are elected
·
Centers
could encourage parents to vote
o
Centers must
be careful to be non-partisan
·
There is a
June 28th meeting on what 501-C-3’s are allowed to do to be
involved in election activities through the Minnesota Council on Nonprofits
(information on MCN’s website, www.mcn.org)
·
Parents
could also invite candidates
·
Candidate
forums are also being organized through Big Leap (information from CCW)
4.
2003-2004 Specific Legislation
·
Fraud
(suggestions probably coming from the “Systems Approach to Financing” track)
·
Budget
reductions are likely
·
Consolidation
could be a large topic
o
We could
form a group to make proactive proposals in regard to consolidation and bring
those suggestions to CFL
·
TEACH
o
Talk to
Senate leadership about strategy
·
Could get
Barb Sykora to take committees on center tours as part of their orientation
·
Experienced
Aide
o
Child care
center directors to come to the legislature with recommendations on the
experienced aide bill
o
Centers are
more amenable to change recently, because the staffing crisis has died down a
little
·
Regulations
o
Quality of
licensed care is dwindling, because licensors are losing resources
o
Develop
interactive guidelines to give licensors more specifics to look for
o
Find out
what the licensing needs are
§
Check out
statistics. Could use them with the
media
§
Set up a
meeting
§
Talk to
county associations
5.
Media
·
Outline for
families
·
Work on a
unified message and one voice for the early childhood community
·
Work on
diminishing enmity within the early childhood community
·
Develop and
look for future “hooks” in the early childhood community for the media
·
Write
letters to the editors
o
Relate
happenings in the legislature and its links to child care
o
Thank the
editor anytime there is a focus on child care issues
6.
Revenue
·
Check-off
box on tax return_
·
License
plate with kids on it
o
The money
made this way might not end up where we expected
·
Tobacco tax
might be raised
7.
Concrete Steps
·
This
conference is a first good step
·
CCW
Convention and MnAEYC Conference would be a nice occasion to meet again and
continue the conversation
o
We could use
the media well there
·
Get all
groups involved in Voices for Children
Advocacy Day 2003 to agree on one platform
Systems
Approach to Financing the Profession
Group Leader: Deborah Fitzwater-Dewey
Panel Members: Margaret
Boyer, Todd Otis
Recorder: Carol Marxen
Explore
comprehensive legislative approaches to the problems concerning wages and
benefits in the profession.
1.
Recent
History--last 5 years or so
·
Todd Otis—Ready
4 K is a non-profit organization incorporated in June 2001 dedicated to
changing public opinion on early childhood issues.
Ready 4 K grew out of the work of Minnesota’s Early Care and
Education Finance Commission, a distinguished group of citizens who made many
bold and far-reaching recommendations to policy-makers that were largely ignored
in the 2001 Minnesota legislative session.
·
Margaret
Boyer—Alliance of Early Childhood Professionals (AECP) founded in 1979—for
better conditions for Child Development Professionals Means Better Care for
Children. They have done Economic
Summits, Think Tanks, with economists and visionaries from business and higher
ed and early childhood visionaries.
·
Three
strategies--financial aid office, quality initiative, development office
·
Website – www.earlychildpro.org
·
Current
Projects—Public
Policy, Leadership Development, Tools to Tackle Turnover, Research
2.
Major
Advancements and Major Obstacles to Progress
Advancements
·
Child Care
Sliding Fee Scale--$2 million a year—good for population in MN
·
Army
model—pay a certain percentage of their income for child care
·
Influx of
men as advocates—men who are in the public arena
·
Todd had men
testify
·
Men in
Childcare
·
ECFE in our
state—a system in which people are making a living wage
·
TEACH
·
Philanthropic
community
·
We have some
fundamental building blocks that will help us to build a quality state with ECE
housed in the Dept. of Children, Families and Learning
Obstacles
·
Fragmentation
of field
·
What does
quality mean_
·
Need to make
public aware of what we are doing in ECE and why it is important
·
Not well
organized support/public
·
Getting past
“self-serving vision” when we go to the legislature for more money
·
Dichotomy of
high standards for child care workers and low pay
·
Lack of
“reporting/governing” structure that puts all the field on the same
“page”
·
Children
cannot advocate for themselves. Should
always have one person in a meeting that advocates for the child—what would
the child think_
·
Erosion of
licensed system
·
“Wal-Mart
vs Saks” Parent choice—they
want Saks quality, but want to shop at Wal-Mart
·
“Turf wars”
3.
Strategies
for Addressing Obstacles /Long-Term Actions
·
Todd—don’t
cut childcare
·
Look what
happened when we cut public schools—time to raise taxes
·
Candidates
cannot run on the policy of raising taxes
·
Studies—Where
do preK licenses go_
·
All kids
need to be screened (development) focusing possible needs
·
Kagan, S.
L., Brandon R. N., Ripple, C. H., Maher,
E. J., & Joesch, J.M. (2002). “Supporting Quality Early Childhood Care and Education”
Addressing Compensation and Infrastructure.”
Young Children, 58-72.
·
Minnesota’s
Child Care Problem: A Way Out: Paying a worth wage to early
childhood/school age workforce.
Affordable Care for Families, and Quality Care for Children.
Draft
copy written by Alliance of Early Childhood Professionals
·
Increasing
“sliding scale” for all families and children
·
Sliding
scale tiers tied to quality/level of child care—Universal sliding scale
·
Unification
of segments in the field—plan includes private child care centers
·
Educate
Legislators
·
Personal
direct contact with a variety of legislators
·
Repeated
contact with legislators
·
Network with
legislators
·
Specific
message—clear focused message
·
Pushing the
leadership within the caucus group-
·
Legislators
are concerned about how do we maintain the majority
·
Depends on
who the new governor as to how much we can get—We should at least try to make
some progress each year—maybe have different plans
·
DON’T CUT
KIDS!!!
·
Parent/Public
support—user friendly terminology—how_
o
Use
different terminology—“child development” or “educare” rather than
“child care”
o
Continuum of
care for children—
o
“Catch
phrases” need to know what is meant behind the phrase
·
Universally
affordable quality child-care—bottom line is unit price—need to define and
educate what quality is for field, legislators, and public.
·
AARP/Mn
Seniors Federation—need to bond with them—“Future is today”
·
How do you
work with schools_
·
Magnify
enhanced legally unlicensed care—
o
Basic ties
to public funding
o
Lower rates
for unlicensed care
4.
Planning/Coordinating
Follow-up Events
·
MnAEYC News
public policy education
·
MnAEYC
position statement on unlicensed care/funding
·
Each person
pledges 3 hours on each level of state/federal government
·
Attend
candidate forums
·
Write a
letter to the editor
·
Dayton
hearings across the state—Childcare Block Grant funding
·
Conference/workshop
on political action—“how to” “Communicating with Legislators for
Dummies”
T.E.A.C.H. Early Childhood ® MINNESOTA & Early Childhood
Workforce
Retention Project
Leader: Valeri Peterson, Avisia Whitman
Recorder: Barb Schoenbeck
|
Vision without action is merely a dream. Action without vision is just passing time. Vision with action can change the world. Joel Arthur Barker |
TEACH
Recommendations:
· Start Small
· Provide sufficient incentives
· Do it well
· Use data—track and publish results
· Be clear—stay focused on goals
· Target education/compensation/retention
· Be inclusive
· Collaborate—partner dollars
· Be political and strategic
· Think system and not just program
· Don’t be discouraged
TEACH
Early Childhood Outcomes:
· Participant satisfaction and impact
· Penetration—where are we in the workforce
· Education/compensation/retention
· Effect on the system (availability, flexibility, licensing)
Higher
Education Sub-Group
|
We
have: ·
A higher education in transition ·
No early childhood certification/licensure system ·
Articulation agreements not systematic ·
Moving toward statewide consistency—technical and
community colleges ·
Many, many TEACH candidates at many levels |
We
need: ·
More articulation agreement ·
TEACH advisors/counselors to assist ·
Students with degree paths in various education
systems to ·
Clarify paths to degree ·
CDA—credit or non-credit ·
Entrance requirements—portfolio rather than
testing ·
Early education—teacher licensure separate from
Elem Ed licensure to retain teachers with BA/BS degree ·
Student support including for alternative learners
(ESL) ·
TEACH entrance that I.D.’s who want/are
appropriate for accredited education |
|
Action
Steps: ·
GET INFORMATION ·
Investigate and determine current articulate
agreements in MN higher education ·
Investigate TEACH agreements/systems with other
states ·
CREATE STUDENT SUPPORTS ·
Advisors, handbook, community resources, college
liaisons, tools for success including assistance to non-traditional
learners, coordinate financial services ·
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES ·
Stay actively involved in credentialing issues and
systems, including legislation IN ADDITION: ·
Address and include rural MN/greater MN/ mid-rural
MN ·
Immigrant providers and E.L.L. ·
Non-credit options for training CDA, Project
Exceptional, PIP, ITTI, Cultural Dynamics, Second step, etc. ·
Consider TEACH paying for prior learning credits ·
Advocate for maintaining college level programs |
|
Public Relations Sub-Group
|
We
have: ·
A simple, fundamental message ·
To communicate to 2 related audiences ·
Parents/public ·
Child care providers/educators ·
More p.r. expertise within the early childhood
field (or to utilize existing expertise more effectively) ·
A webpage—a marketing plan ·
To incorporate directors into program ·
Director’s email/contact information—a mailing |
We
have: ·
75 people at this conference ·
Association/organizations at state and local
levels—ex. MnAEYC, Directors, associations, R and R agencies, MCCAm etc, ·
A good video, success stories |
|
Action
Steps: ·
Develop a statewide comprehensive marketing plan
behind a simple fundamental message with emphasis on center directors and
family child care providers from a source they trust. ·
Address the “scary out” of going to college |
|
Men in Early Childhood Education--Birth to Age
Eight
Leader: Bryan Nelson
Recorder: Dan Gartrell
History
1.
During 19th century, women more frequently became teachers, due to
changing demographics.
2.
That trend reinforced image of field that it is women’s field.
3.
Presently 16 percent male teachers at elementary level; 4% in
prekindergarten. The challenge is
to move from an image of “counter culture” guys to mainstream guys as
acceptable teachers of young children.
Obstacles
and Progress
Obstacles:
1.
Stereotypes--on part of women--will take over profession;
society--
early
ed is women’s work; “real men” aren’t early ed teachers
2.
Fear of accusation of abuse
3.
Low status
4.
Low pay
Progress:
1.
Effective materials: books, reports, articles, videos--
including
materials for recruiting, supporting men as teachers
2.
Growing acceptance of importance of men in early childhood education--at
least within the profession
3.
Growing understanding of importance of fathering--cultural carryover
possibility to work in early childhood education.
Recommendations/Talking Points for Further Progress
1.
Challenge and eliminate stereotypes
Key Action:
Develop workshops for men and women staff challenging gender stereotypes about
men in early childhood education
2.
Improve the status of early childhood education by educating public
Key Action:
Use media figures as spokespersons; Public service announcements; identical
bulletins appearing in many journals, newsletters etc; articles and theme issues
in publications such as the new VIEWS
3.
Develop a position statement to be adopted by MnAEYC and other groups and
organizations within and outside of Minnesota
Key Action:
Committee is being convened and will draft document
4.
Develop legislation to balance gender disparities--in early childhood
& other fields
Key Action:
Work with key legislators on legislation to recruit and support members
of the gender-minority group to improve equity in profession
5.
Actively recruit and support men to teach young children
Key Action:
Recruitment:
career days, senior citizen events, church events, dislocated worker
programs. Scholarship development.
Early and frequent field experiences with children in early childhood
settings.
Support:
Resources to programs for sustaining men in field; develop and promote policies
for family childcare programs, centers, and schools that support men and women
staff. Mentoring programs, other
peer support methods
6.
Improve wages and benefits for all staff
Key Action:
Support early childhood initiatives, such as TEACH, Ready for K;
systems/comprehensive legislative efforts
7.
Evaluate progress at establishing gender equity in early childhood
education
Key Action:
Review trends to be vigilant about: possible stratification within field by
gender; regular surveying of memberships of groups as to changing attitudes,
values, demographics relative to the gender equity issue.
Follow-up
Actions
1.
Initiate the development and approval of the position statement, starting
with MnAEYC: SPRING of 2003
2.
Compile and disseminate materials and resources around the position
statement and gender equity issues: SPRING of 2003
3.
Do theme issue of VIEWS, applying Male Teacher YC issue specific to
Minnesota: FALL OF 2003
4.
Establish a State Gender Equity Task Force focusing on improving gender
equity in Minnesota vocations: LEGISLATIVE
SESSION 2004.
5.
Contribute to the development of an NAEYC position statement.
Vision statement:
Our goal is for early childhood classrooms to mirror the best of our
democratic society in terms of there being gender equity in early childhood
teachers.